Monkey
Trial Airs on PBS (2.25.02)
Phillip Johnson talks about the recent airing of Monkey Trial on
PBS, pointing out in particular how the show demolishes the Inherit the Wind
myth. more
...
More
from Ohio (1.31.02)
In this week's installment, Phillip Johnson (with the help of John
Calvert) discusses the Ohio School Board situation in greater depth. He cites,
in particular, the interest in intelligent design shown by the Science Standards
Committee of the Board. more
...
Curriculum
Controversy in Ohio (1.17.02)
Unhappy with an early draft of the proposed science curriculum for
grades K-12, several members of the Ohio State Board of Education are pushing
for a rewrite that would present evolution as "an assumption, not fact,"
and would include an alternative explanation for how humans and all other
living things came to exist. more
...
Wells
Hits a Home Run at Harvard (12.02.01)
Phillip Johnson talks about the latest events, including a follow-up
to the recent Wells/Palumbi debate at Harvard. more
...
An
Interview with the BBC (11.27.01)
Phillip Johnson is interviewed by the BBC, and more on the Dembski Kauffman
debate in New Mexico. more
...
Dembski
and Kauffman Square Off in New Mexico
(11.19.01) On Tuesday, November 13th, at the University
of New Mexico in Albuquerque about 500 to 600 people attended a remarkable
event. William Dembski and Stuart Kauffman had a public encounter in which
Kauffman, the preeminent self-organizational theorist of the Santa Fe Institute,
publicly admitted that intelligent design was a legitimate intellectual and
scientific project and that research projects like SETI (the Search for Extraterrestrial
Intelligence) couldn't even get off the ground without it. more
...
Dembski/Pigliucci
Debate (11.13.01) A
summary of the Dembski/Pigliucci Debate held November 1, 2001 at the New York
Academy of Sciences more
...
No
Free Lunch (10.30.01)
Phillip Johnson introduces William Dembski's latest book, No
Free Lunch, along with a short note from William Dembski. more
...
My
return to public lecturing, and the New York Review of Books plays its part
in the Wedge strategy (10.09.01)
Phillip Johnson continues his discussion of a two-part article
by Frederick C. Crews in the New York Review of Books. Johnson states
that in the second part of the article Crews "gives similar treatment
to the accommodationist efforts of John Haught, Michael Ruse, Stephen Jay
Gould, and Kenneth Miller, agreeing with William Provine that 'If you want
to marry Christian doctrine with modern evolutionary biology, you have to
check your brains at the church-house door.'" more
...
New
York Review Enters the Fray (9.25.01)
In this week's article, Phillip Johnson discusses a two-part
article by Frederick C. Crews in the New York Review of Books, which
"trashes books by Michael Behe, William Dembski, Jonathan Wells, and
myself." Johnson states, "The long review provides no evidence that
Crews has read the books, much less thought seriously about the issues; it
consists mainly of standard scientific materialist put-downs that could have
been stitched together from handouts distributed by any of the so-called skeptic
societies." more
...
Divisive
Issues(9.10.01) Returning
to his weekly column, Phillip Johnson discusses a potentially divisive issue
among the scientific community, citing Michael Ruse's argument in a recent
book that Darwinists can also be Christians. Welcome back Phil! more
...
More
Discussion with Richard Dawkins (8.13.01)
On Friday, July 13, 2001, Phil Johnson suffered a stroke. He is currently
undergoing rehabilitation therapy, and hopes to return to his normal activities
soon. The following Weekly Wedge Update was in preparation when Phil
became ill. It covers recent correspondence between Phil and Richard Dawkins,
and concludes with comments from Paul Nelson. more
...
Richard
Dawkins
(7.09.01)
Phillip Johnson talks about recent email dialogs with Richard
Dawkins, and cites more examples of the "empty rants" of scientific
materialism. more
...
Scott
Blows Smoke in Science (6.25.01)
This week's Update talks about Eugenie Scott's review in the June 22 issue
of Science, which attacks Jonathan Wells famous book Icons
of Evolution, a book thatexposes the errors and frauds permeating
evolutionary biology textbooks.Johnson also discusses a recent ID cover story
from the San Francisco Weekly.more
...
Errors
and Alarms (6.18.01)
In this week's report Phillip Johnson discusses the prevalence
of errors and misunderstandings in Darwinist writing. According to Johnson,
these misunderstandings demonstrate the need for an open process of public
discussion, to help citizens (and even professors) to become better informed.
Johnson also discusses this week's endorsement by the United States Senate
of an intellectual freedom resolution for science education. more
...
The
Pennsylvania Controversy (6.11.01)
This week's Wedge Update contains a letter from Michael Behe supporting
the proposed changes in the Pennsylvania Science Education Standards. Phillip
Johnson also provides an update on last week's events. more
...
Conferences
at Calvin College, Kansas City, and Elsewhere(6.04.01)
Phillip Johnson talks about last weeks conferences and lectures, as well as
upcoming events. He also emphasizes the importance of Design conferences,
stating "Conferences are important not only for what is said in the lectures
and workshop sessions, but as a sign that discussion of Design in biology
has become almost a routine matter in the academic world." more
...
New
Books (5.28.01)
The big event last week was the conference May 24-26 at Calvin College on
"Design, Self-organization, and the Integrity of Creation" hosted
by Bill Dembski and featuring many of the Wedge authors. Phillip Johnson also
discusses two new books, How Blind is the Watchmaker? by Neil Broom,
and Darwin's God by Cornelius G. Hunter. more
...
Lectures
Far and Wide (5.21.01)
Phillip Johnson talks about the events of the past week, including his lecture
in Sacramento, Jonathan Wells, and Roger DeHart. He also shares the experience
of a Colorado Springs student's presentation on teaching evolution, as well
as more press coverage for Intelligent Design. more
...
Lectures,
Articles,and Debates (5.14.01)
It was a busy week on the ID front, with Phillip Johnson
lecturing in Winnipeg at the Christian Medical and Dental Association of Canada,
and in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania at the annual convention of the Christian
Homeschool Association of Pennsylvania. Favorable ID coverage continued, and
a debate was held at California State University Fullerton between paleontologist
Niles Eldredge of the New York Museum of Natural History and Biola University
philosophy professor John Mark Reynolds. more
...
Icons
of Evolution Exposed on CNN (5.07.01)
The big news this week was the CNN telecast overnight on May 3, on their CNN
Newsroom Special Series show that is used in many public and private school
classrooms. more
...
DNA
Demoted (4.30.01)
One complaint that Darwinists like to make against the Intelligent Design
movement is that the concept of design supposedly does not lead
to any scientific research program. Once scientists confirm that organisms
really are designed, the caricature is that they just throw up their hands,
say God did it somehow, and then go off to church. more
...
Inherit
the Wind in Reverse(4.23.01)
The past month has been the best ever for the Intelligent Design
movement. On March 25 the Los
Angeles Times
had a good story about us on page one, featuring the "Inherit the
Wind in reverse" Darwinist persecution of high school teacher Roger DeHart.
DeHart has been ordered by administrators to stop trying to open the minds
of his students, by (among other things) distributing Stephen Jay Gould's
article in Natural History, which acknowledges that the embryo drawings
in the biology textbooks are fraudulent. more...
The
Wedge: A Progress Report
(4.16.01)
Approximately ten years ago,
I formulated the Wedge strategy with two related goals. The first was to legitimate
the topic of intelligent design, and hence the critique of Darwinism and its
basis in naturalistic philosophy, within the mainstream intellectual community.
The second was to make the critique of naturalism the central focus of discussion
in the religious world, replacing the deadlocked debate over the Genesis chronology
which had enabled the Darwinists to employ the "Inherit the Wind stereotype"
so effectively. more...