Access Research NetworkA review of two anti-ID books by Matt Holderness contains examples of how the other side tries to frame the debate.
He seems to insinuate that all adherents to the ID movement have a monolithic belief systems (they're all Christians). Nothing could be further from the truth.
He takes a shot at Behe's irreducible complexity argument, claiming that it is "the old false argument - about the eye having no selection benefit until all its parts are in place - dressed up with molecular biology."
Holderness claims that all 13 chapters of Why Intelligent Design Fails is a "patient and clear specialist rebuttal of the relevant part of these claims."
He further claims that "Intelligent design is clearly an attempt to turn the free speech provision of the US constitution against its ban on establishing religion" and "what is at stake is a choice between rationality and theocracy."
IDers who need to see, in depth, how materialists attempt to debunk ID, may find these books helpful.
File Date: 7.15.04
This data file may be reproduced in its entirety
for non-commercial use.
A return link to the Access Research Network web site would be
appreciated.
Documents on this site which have been reproduced from a previous publication are copyrighted through the individual publication. See the body of the above document for specific copyright information.