Carl Linnaeus features large this week in Nature. He is remembered as a towering figure whose impressive shadow looks likely to reach well beyond this 300 year anniversary. The Editorial draws attention to three distinctive contributions: "his systematic spirit, his stress on the concept of species, and the formal but adaptable conventions of nomenclature he introduced". Also, we read: "Nature is glad to celebrate his legacy in this special issue."
There is another aspect of Linnaeus that deserves our attention. The Father of Taxonomy considered that the living world was the product of a creator God: "Linnaeus believed in fixed species of knowable number created by God and observable by men." It should be pointed out that this summary reflects his early view; as he matured and developed in his thinking, he recognised the reality of speciation within distinct groups of organisms. But is his creation-oriented biology part of his legacy? Not in the opinion of the editors of Nature: "He would hopefully come round to evolutionary theory".
What if he failed to "come round"? What if he developed further his polyphyletic approach? What if he were to argue that the Tree of Life were a construct of ideology, not a result of empirical science? Would he then be disowned by the community of scientists who declare their pleasure in celebrating his legacy? Of course, these are all hypothetical questions. However, the deeper issue is this: Linnaeus did not separate his thinking into "public" and "private" compartments. He sought a unified understanding of the natural world. He was a theistic scientist. He was open to the possibility of seeing design in the living world, and he found it. He showed that design inferences were part of the early days of science, and that modern day attempts to banish intelligent design from the vocabulary of science take us away from the historic roots of our discipline. This is an aspect of Linnaeus' legacy that we do well not to overlook.
The legacy of Linnaeus
Editorial
Nature 446, 231-232 (15 March 2007) | doi:10.1038/446231b
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Evolution has become a favorite topic of the news media recently, but for some reason, they never seem to get the story straight. The staff at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture started this Blog to set the record straight and make sure you knew "the rest of the story".
A blogger from New England offers his intelligent reasoning.
We are a group of individuals, coming from diverse backgrounds and not speaking for any organization, who have found common ground around teleological concepts, including intelligent design. We think these concepts have real potential to generate insights about our reality that are being drowned out by political advocacy from both sides. We hope this blog will provide a small voice that helps rectify this situation.
Website dedicated to comparing scenes from the "Inherit the Wind" movie with factual information from actual Scopes Trial. View 37 clips from the movie and decide for yourself if this movie is more fact or fiction.
Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio
Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.
Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.
Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"
Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.
A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
Biola University.