Post details: The "remarkable complexity" of RNP complexes

02/28/07

Permalinkby 04:08:27 pm, Categories: Literature - Articles, 388 words   English (UK)

The "remarkable complexity" of RNP complexes

Although "less than 2% of the human genome is translated into protein, yet more than 40% of the genome is thought to be transcribed into RNA." This non-coding RNA has some "truly remarkable" characteristics: "microRNAs, short interfering (si)RNAs, repeat-associated RNAs and germline-specific RNAs) and of new members of existing classes (for example, small nucleolar (sno)RNAs)".

A recent review paper is concerned with the "biogenesis, trafficking and mechanisms of action of small nuclear and small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (RNPs)." The authors refer to the "remarkable complexity" of these RNP complexes, pointers to which are as follows:
"ncRNAs have emerged as key trans-acting regulators of diverse cellular activities in all three domains of life."
"Ongoing studies of snRNPs and snoRNPs have revealed unexpectedly elaborate biogenesis pathways."
"ncRNAs often require partner proteins that provide various essential functions in addition to the obvious associated enzymatic activities."
"A common principle in the biogenesis of both snRNPs and snoRNPs is the assembly of stable, but inactive, pre-RNPs that require maturation at locations distinct from the functional sites."

It used to be said that DNA coding for protein was the only thing that mattered in the genome, and all else was lumped under the descriptor "Junk DNA". But not now! Is the term "Junk DNA" best understood as an outdated concept emerging from a very inadequate view of the genome? But even more important, with all this complexity emerging from DNA that does not code for protein, what does this imply for our understanding of living things? A friend writes: "Probability decreases EXPONENTIALLY as complexity increases. When do we reach an increase that makes the Darwinian hypothesis completely incredible? Seems like we must be there now."

Non-coding RNAs: lessons from the small nuclear and small nucleolar RNAs
A. Gregory Matera, Rebecca M. Terns and Michael P. Terns
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 8, 209-220 (March 2007) | doi:10.1038/nrm2124

Abstract: Recent advances have fuelled rapid growth in our appreciation of the tremendous number, diversity and biological importance of non-coding (nc)RNAs. Because ncRNAs typically function as ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes and not as naked RNAs, understanding their biogenesis is crucial to comprehending their regulation and function. The small nuclear and small nucleolar RNPs are two well studied classes of ncRNPs with elaborate assembly and trafficking pathways that provide paradigms for understanding the biogenesis of other ncRNPs.

Summary of paper here.

Permalink

Literature

July 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Search

Linkblog

Links - Groups and Organizations

Links - Of General Interest

  • A Brief View of Time and Those That Live There

    Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio

    Permalink
  • A Quick Guide to Sequenced Genomes Permalink
  • ARN Related Web Links Permalink
  • Creation/Evolution Quotes

    Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.

    Permalink
  • CreationEvolutionDesign

    Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.

    Permalink
  • Darwinian Fairytales by David Stove

    Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"

    Permalink
  • ID The Future

    Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.

    Permalink
  • John Mark Reynolds Blog

    A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
    Biola University.

    Permalink
  • NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day Permalink

Misc

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution