According to some educationalists, science teachers face a curious paradox. â€œIn our culture, schools are designed to present established understandings, not to promote discovery of new knowledge. [â€¦] The ensuing culture of conformity with established knowledge is the very antithesis of scientific inquiry.â€ Instead of experiencing science as an exhilarating quest for truth, students feel the burden of learning lots of textbook knowledge.
The article cited below focuses attention on how classrooms can create genuine environments for discovery, and this is good. However, the tried-and-tested strategy for countering the paradox is to make students aware of controversies within science. This fans the flames of curiosity and demonstrates that the â€œend of scienceâ€ has not been documented in the textbook!
In biological education, there is ample evidence of a â€œculture of conformity with established knowledgeâ€. This is shown by enormous resistance to any suggestion of critical discussion of Darwinism in the classroom. Teachers who entertain the thought may be considered subversive to science. Addressing this problem requires more than providing an environment for discovery. It requires a commitment to freedom of enquiry within science and following the evidence wherever it leads.
INQUIRY LEARNING: Teaching Scientific Inquiry
David I. Hanauer, Deborah Jacobs-Sera, Marisa L. Pedulla, Steven G. Cresawn, Roger W. Hendrix, and Graham F. Hatfull
Science 314, 22 December 2006: 1880-1881.
Opening two paragraphs:
Science teachers in kindergarten to 12th grade (K-12) classrooms face a curious paradox. On one hand, according to the generally accepted theory, scientific inquiry in the classroom is "at the heart of the science and science learning" (1). In essence, the teaching of science should mirror the processes used by professional scientific researchers. On the other hand, a school classroom is not a research laboratory. Scientific research typically involves complex methods and problem-solving approaches (2), resulting in conclusions that are subjected to worldwide evaluation (3-6). Capturing these characteristics of professional science within the K-12 school classroom is daunting (7).
The goals of scientific research and current pedagogical practice are at odds (8, 9). In our culture, schools are designed to present established understandings, not to promote discovery of new knowledge. The focus on persuading students of the correctness of stated information is intensified by increased reliance on broad-based standardized testing, which--especially in the United States and the United Kingdom--has become a popular mechanism for making schools accountable. The ensuing culture of conformity with established knowledge is the very antithesis of scientific inquiry (8).
|<< <||> >>|
Evolution has become a favorite topic of the news media recently, but for some reason, they never seem to get the story straight. The staff at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture started this Blog to set the record straight and make sure you knew "the rest of the story".
A blogger from New England offers his intelligent reasoning.
We are a group of individuals, coming from diverse backgrounds and not speaking for any organization, who have found common ground around teleological concepts, including intelligent design. We think these concepts have real potential to generate insights about our reality that are being drowned out by political advocacy from both sides. We hope this blog will provide a small voice that helps rectify this situation.
Website dedicated to comparing scenes from the "Inherit the Wind" movie with factual information from actual Scopes Trial. View 37 clips from the movie and decide for yourself if this movie is more fact or fiction.
Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio
Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.
Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.
Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"
Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.
A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at