Arguments for and against the teaching of intelligent design in Pennsylvania public schools were heard in a pretrial hearing on Thursday, July 14th, once again opening up a debate that has reignited controversy across the nation.
Eight families filed a federal lawsuit charging the school with violation of the separation of church and state. They claim that intelligent design is just another version of creationism.
In the pretrial hearings on Thursday, lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union representing the eight families began their attacks on intelligent design.
According to the courts, creationism cannot be taught in public schools because it is a religion. The current lawsuit must determine whether the school district’s policy was motivated by the intent to teach about creationism and religion.
Defense attorneys from the Thomas More Law Center argue that the school district’s motivation was purely educational.
What's interesting is the religion vs science false dichotomy is claimed time and again, when the debate should be framed as science vs science. Also, if it can be proved that just the "intent" of the York school district was to teach "creationism", then it would be unconstitutional. Reminds one of the "intent reasoning" of the recent Supreme Court ruling on the display of the Ten Commandments in Kentucky. They were okay in Texas, but not in Kentucky. Apparently, judges can read minds.
For the article, click HERE.
A reminder about the Uncommon Dissent Forum in Greenville, SC the first week of August.
For the details, click HERE.
The L.A. Times picked up on a story by Ben Feller of the AP on the "attack" of Darwinism in the public schools.
What is interesting is what science teachers are saying about ID. For instance, teachers are saying that the Darwinism - ID "fight" is just political. Faye Haas, a Chemistry teacher states that "to spend half the time talking about things that speak against it (Darwinism) doesn't make any sense." So, we just ignore the gaping holes in the theory, and assert that it is fact??
For other thoughts from educators, read the article HERE.
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Evolution has become a favorite topic of the news media recently, but for some reason, they never seem to get the story straight. The staff at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture started this Blog to set the record straight and make sure you knew "the rest of the story".
A blogger from New England offers his intelligent reasoning.
We are a group of individuals, coming from diverse backgrounds and not speaking for any organization, who have found common ground around teleological concepts, including intelligent design. We think these concepts have real potential to generate insights about our reality that are being drowned out by political advocacy from both sides. We hope this blog will provide a small voice that helps rectify this situation.
Website dedicated to comparing scenes from the "Inherit the Wind" movie with factual information from actual Scopes Trial. View 37 clips from the movie and decide for yourself if this movie is more fact or fiction.
Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio
Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.
Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.
Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"
Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.
A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
Biola University.