Archives for: July 2005, 15

07/15/05

Permalinkby 04:19:48 pm, Categories: Books/Videos/Reviews, ID Critics, 85 words   English (US)

Eugenie Scott's foot-in-the-mouth problem

Eugenie Scott recently stated on NPR that real scientists should not debate ID in public because most people are "naive". Name calling and implying that the vast majority of people are stupid is a good sign that the end is in sight. This seems to be an opening for ID proponents because it makes clear that we are committed to a culture of rational discourse and the other side is not.

William Dembski blogged on this "foot-in-mouth" disease of Scott. Click HERE for the blog.

Permalink
Permalinkby 03:56:37 pm, Categories: Education, 345 words   English (US)

Kansas board targets Darwinism - Changes encourage evolution criticism

Earlier this week, two members of the Kansas Science Committee and one other member of the Board offered further revisions to the June 9 draft of the Science standards which essentially made that draft consistent with the Minority Report and the provisions that 23 experts validated during the hearings in May.

An article by Diane Carroll in the Kansas City Star provides an inaccurate description of the actions taken.

The article illustrates the strategy of the opposition evolving from "you are putting ID into the standards," to "you are putting in the standards a concept "friendly to ID." Since they are friendly to ID, they should not be allowed. This essentially means that criticisms of evolution are not allowed because all criticisms are going to be friendly to ID. This elevates evolution to the status of an ideology. Of course, the State can not promote an ideology.

One of the major misstatements in the Star article is relevant to this issue. The article incorrectly states that

"There was, however, at least some new language added to the standards. The following paragraph, offered by Bacon, was adopted: "We also emphasize that the science curriculum standards do not include intelligent design, the scientific disagreement with the claim of many evolutionary biologists that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion. While the testimony presented at the science hearings included many advocates of intelligent design, these standards neither mandate nor prohibit teaching about this scientific disagreement."

Substantively this is not a new addition.. The language has been in the minority report from inception:

"According to many scientists a core claim of evolutionary theory is that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion. Other scientists disagree. These standards neither mandate nor prohibit teaching about this scientific disagreement."

The language is significant because it provides a defintion of ID that shows on its face to be "scientific." Hence, even though ID is not being added, it is being appropriately defined.

Thanks to John Calvert for the clarifications above.

For the full article (you may need to register), click HERE.

Permalink
Permalinkby 03:47:00 pm, Categories: Current Events, 18 words   English (US)

Signs of Intelligence?

The Weekly Standard weighs in on ID vs naturalism via Isaac Constantine.

For the entire article, click HERE.

Permalink

In the News

July 2005
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

Linkblog

Links - Groups and Organizations

Links - Of General Interest

  • A Brief View of Time and Those That Live There

    Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio

    Permalink
  • A Quick Guide to Sequenced Genomes Permalink
  • ARN Related Web Links Permalink
  • Creation/Evolution Quotes

    Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.

    Permalink
  • CreationEvolutionDesign

    Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.

    Permalink
  • Darwinian Fairytales by David Stove

    Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"

    Permalink
  • ID The Future

    Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.

    Permalink
  • John Mark Reynolds Blog

    A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
    Biola University.

    Permalink
  • NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day Permalink

Misc

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution