Christoph Schonborn, the Roman Catholic cardinal archbishop of Vienna, has an op-ed piece published in the New York Times.
In the piece, he points out that Pope John Paul II never endorsed Darwinism, as Darwin proponents constantly assert. He did, however, leave the door open for theisitic evolution (common ancestry).
The archbishop of Vienna says that "neo-Darwinists recently have sought to portray our new pope, Benedict XVI, as a satisfied evolutionist. They have quoted a sentence about common ancestry from a 2004 document of the International Theological Commission, pointed out that Benedict was at the time head of the commission, and concluded that the Catholic Church has no problem with the notion of "evolution" as used by mainstream biologists - that is, synonymous with neo-Darwinism."
Nothing could be further from the truth, for the Pope said in his homily at his installation that "we are not some casual and meaningless product of evolution. Each of us is the result of a thought of God. Each of us is willed, each of us is loved, each of us is necessary."
The disingenuousness of Darwinists who make the claim that the Catholic Church's position is that Darwinism is true is apparent, and must be challenged.
For the full commentary, click HERE.
Put on your waders...the proponents of naturalism have always tried to point out that the world is full of examples of lousy design, therefore, the intelligent designer is bumbling and inept. The latest commentary comes via the L. A. Times by Dr. David P. Barash, a psychologist.
Odd that a naturalist would try to make a theological argument about the nature of God (intelligent designer), by asserting that the designer wouldn't do it this way. There may be an optimum design in Dr. Barash's imagination, but given the nature of the cosmos and the "laws" that govern it, and the specified complexity of biological systems, trade-offs in design are likely necessary. Therefore, in actuality, the design is the best available for the various functions of the creature in question.
A doctor would weigh in by stating that the naturalist's conclusion just begs the question, because you could raise the bar by asserting that our bodies couldn't have been intelligently designed because we're not immortal.
Dr. Barash whines about the ineptitude of the designer with regard to the male genitourinary system, which is set up to allow for the two separate male functions, while protecting each system from each other. In addition, the testicles actually do descend in order to allow for adequate fertility.
For the commentary, click HERE.
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Evolution has become a favorite topic of the news media recently, but for some reason, they never seem to get the story straight. The staff at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture started this Blog to set the record straight and make sure you knew "the rest of the story".
A blogger from New England offers his intelligent reasoning.
We are a group of individuals, coming from diverse backgrounds and not speaking for any organization, who have found common ground around teleological concepts, including intelligent design. We think these concepts have real potential to generate insights about our reality that are being drowned out by political advocacy from both sides. We hope this blog will provide a small voice that helps rectify this situation.
Website dedicated to comparing scenes from the "Inherit the Wind" movie with factual information from actual Scopes Trial. View 37 clips from the movie and decide for yourself if this movie is more fact or fiction.
Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio
Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.
Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.
Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"
Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.
A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
Biola University.