The Darwinism - ID debate may reach into the Montana State Legislature later this year if some representatives have their way.
One debate will be over whether the curriculum decisions will be made at the local or state level.
Of course, science educators don't see intelligent design as an alternative. Here come the talking points:
"Creationism is based on supernatural, religious, mystic beliefs. There is no scientific basis; it can't be proven or disproved with empirical data."
"There are reasons why it (ID) is not science. I'm not knocking anyone's beliefs, but it's not testable by the rigors of science."
"The public needs to be wary of those promoting intelligent design."
"There are people saying they are in favor of this intelligent design theory and they say they have a Ph.D. or a doctorate, but what are they doctors in? I doubt very much it's in evolutionary science or biology or in any field related to evolution."
Gee...ever heard of Dr. Michael Behe, Dr. Jonathan Wells, Dr. Forrest Mims III, etc...?
When are they going to debate the actual merits of the views instead of making ad homenim attacks and bald assertions?
For the full article by John Fitzgerald of the Billings Gazette, click HERE.
In an article by Cornelia Dean in the New York Times a fairly balanced piece on the Kansas "debate" was presented.
Watch for these problems though:
- the use of the equivocal term "evolution," which is never defined. ("Evolution" can mean many things (change over time, etc.), but it's the Darwinian mechanism we have a problem with.)
- that there is no real evidence, independent from faith, against Darwinism. (Darwinists have to exercise a certain amount of faith to believe their position, because the evidence is either not there, or is equivocal. But they vehemently deny their faith.)
- faith is not a factor influencing opinions on all sides of the debate. (Darwinists assert that their position has airtight evidence, but it really is not.)
For the full article (you may have to register with the New York Times), click HERE.
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
Evolution has become a favorite topic of the news media recently, but for some reason, they never seem to get the story straight. The staff at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture started this Blog to set the record straight and make sure you knew "the rest of the story".
A blogger from New England offers his intelligent reasoning.
We are a group of individuals, coming from diverse backgrounds and not speaking for any organization, who have found common ground around teleological concepts, including intelligent design. We think these concepts have real potential to generate insights about our reality that are being drowned out by political advocacy from both sides. We hope this blog will provide a small voice that helps rectify this situation.
Website dedicated to comparing scenes from the "Inherit the Wind" movie with factual information from actual Scopes Trial. View 37 clips from the movie and decide for yourself if this movie is more fact or fiction.
Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio
Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.
Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.
Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"
Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.
A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
Biola University.