In an OPEN FORUM in the San Francisco Chronicle, Stanford neurology professor Robert M. Sapolsky discusses the current origin of life issue.
This commentary is a magnificent example of tortured thinking and ad hominem attacks, and, therefore is a must read to understand how the far left "progressive" mind interprets the world we live in.
Dr. Sapolsky, much more intelligent than I am, as a matter of fact, makes some foolish factual errors and mistakes in reasoning.
He states that "scientists don't argue about whether evolution is for real; that's proven. They argue about how exactly it works."
First, there is a vigorous debate amongst scientists on whether Darwinian theory is the most plausible explanation for life's origin and development. Of course, Sapolsky could be referring to "real" scientists without agendas, not scientists like Michael Behe, Dean Kenyon, William Dembski, or, now, former atheist Antony Flew (my tongue in cheek).
Second, Darwinian evolution is all about the "how it works" (random mutation and natural selection), and there is plenty of vigorous debate on this subject. How about the disagreement between strict Darwinists like Richard Dawkins, and punctuated equilibra proponents like the late Stephen J. Gould and Nils Eldredge? The obvious seems to escape Dr. Sapolsky!
The rhetoric really ramps up when Dr. Sapolsky describes from whence the intelligent design proponents come. He comments, " Undeniably, some are scientists (although it is rare that their expertise is in the realm of evolutionary biology). Others are educated nonscientists. But the rank and file of intelligent design supporters is most likely to come from the parts of the country with the lowest literacy rates, the lowest percentages of high-school graduates and the lowest rates of government investments in education. Much has been made of the, er, Jed-Clampett profile of the typical intelligent-design supporter..."
Suddenly I'm simultaneously noting some arrogance and sensing that my IQ is slipping.
In the doctor's eyes, most IDers are mentally challenged, perhaps worthy, by some, of being a protected class. His commentary should qualify, according to the progressive's definition, as "hate speech." What's good for the goose is good for the gander!
For this "rich" commentary, please click HERE.
No Pingbacks for this post yet...
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Evolution has become a favorite topic of the news media recently, but for some reason, they never seem to get the story straight. The staff at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture started this Blog to set the record straight and make sure you knew "the rest of the story".
A blogger from New England offers his intelligent reasoning.
We are a group of individuals, coming from diverse backgrounds and not speaking for any organization, who have found common ground around teleological concepts, including intelligent design. We think these concepts have real potential to generate insights about our reality that are being drowned out by political advocacy from both sides. We hope this blog will provide a small voice that helps rectify this situation.
Website dedicated to comparing scenes from the "Inherit the Wind" movie with factual information from actual Scopes Trial. View 37 clips from the movie and decide for yourself if this movie is more fact or fiction.
Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio
Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.
Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.
Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"
Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.
A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
Biola University.