Post details: Controversy Over Life's Origins Regardless of How it Works, Evolution is for Real

12/10/04

Permalinkby 07:11:11 pm, Categories: ID Critics, 359 words   English (US)

Controversy Over Life's Origins Regardless of How it Works, Evolution is for Real

In an OPEN FORUM in the San Francisco Chronicle, Stanford neurology professor Robert M. Sapolsky discusses the current origin of life issue.

This commentary is a magnificent example of tortured thinking and ad hominem attacks, and, therefore is a must read to understand how the far left "progressive" mind interprets the world we live in.

Dr. Sapolsky, much more intelligent than I am, as a matter of fact, makes some foolish factual errors and mistakes in reasoning.

He states that "scientists don't argue about whether evolution is for real; that's proven. They argue about how exactly it works."

First, there is a vigorous debate amongst scientists on whether Darwinian theory is the most plausible explanation for life's origin and development. Of course, Sapolsky could be referring to "real" scientists without agendas, not scientists like Michael Behe, Dean Kenyon, William Dembski, or, now, former atheist Antony Flew (my tongue in cheek).

Second, Darwinian evolution is all about the "how it works" (random mutation and natural selection), and there is plenty of vigorous debate on this subject. How about the disagreement between strict Darwinists like Richard Dawkins, and punctuated equilibra proponents like the late Stephen J. Gould and Nils Eldredge? The obvious seems to escape Dr. Sapolsky!

The rhetoric really ramps up when Dr. Sapolsky describes from whence the intelligent design proponents come. He comments, " Undeniably, some are scientists (although it is rare that their expertise is in the realm of evolutionary biology). Others are educated nonscientists. But the rank and file of intelligent design supporters is most likely to come from the parts of the country with the lowest literacy rates, the lowest percentages of high-school graduates and the lowest rates of government investments in education. Much has been made of the, er, Jed-Clampett profile of the typical intelligent-design supporter..."

Suddenly I'm simultaneously noting some arrogance and sensing that my IQ is slipping.

In the doctor's eyes, most IDers are mentally challenged, perhaps worthy, by some, of being a protected class. His commentary should qualify, according to the progressive's definition, as "hate speech." What's good for the goose is good for the gander!

For this "rich" commentary, please click HERE.

Permalink

Pingbacks:

No Pingbacks for this post yet...

In the News

May 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Search

Linkblog

Links - Groups and Organizations

Links - Of General Interest

  • A Brief View of Time and Those That Live There

    Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio

    Permalink
  • A Quick Guide to Sequenced Genomes Permalink
  • ARN Related Web Links Permalink
  • Creation/Evolution Quotes

    Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.

    Permalink
  • CreationEvolutionDesign

    Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.

    Permalink
  • Darwinian Fairytales by David Stove

    Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"

    Permalink
  • ID The Future

    Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.

    Permalink
  • John Mark Reynolds Blog

    A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
    Biola University.

    Permalink
  • NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day Permalink

Misc

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution