An article by Lucas Grundmeier in The Iowa State Daily stated that two atheist professors at Iowa State University attempted to show that ID is illegitimate as a scientific endeavor.
They claimed that "Design can't be separated from the designer." In a sense, this is true. If you found an SUV in the desert, you intuitively know that it didn't appear from random natural processes, but rather, was designed and manufactured by intelligent agents. You are able to infer certain characteristics of the designers and those for whom the SUV was made. For instance, the designers paid careful attention to details, and in some fashion, valued those for whom the SUV was made. This we can intuitively recognize. ID doesn't even take this legitimately reasoned step in identifying the designer(s).
The professors also claimed that ID fails "to identify anything substantive about that designer...and this failure destroys the scientific validity of those arguments." Well, you don't need to know exactly who the designer is to know that that thing was designed. Once you have established that something is designed, you can go on and ask who designed it. This step may not be a scientific endeavor, but rather knowledge revealed to us by the designing agent.
Dr. Patterson made several bold assertions, none backed up with evidence. My favorite was "Science thrives on unanswered questions, religion, by contrast, thrives on unquestioned answers." Patterson's closeminded view of reality dooms him to be a perpetual seeker and not an eventual finder. He also thinks that "intelligent design theorists have an ulterior motive in their work." And atheists don't????
The two professors haul out the false dichotomy that science and faith are not overlapping magisteria.
The bottom line is that the same old arguments are being paraded out, and people who are not careful thinkers buy into the rhetoric.
We are all seeking out the truth concerning the nature of reality. The atheistic worldview boxes itself in, and is more closeminded, by only accepting naturalistic answers to the origins question. The ID worldview is willing to be more openminded, and entertains the possibility that reality can be explained in both a naturalistic and supernaturalistic sense. Let's just look carefully at the evidence from an openminded worldview, and let the best worldview prevail. What could be more fair-minded than that approach in the academic and public arenas?
For the full article click HERE.
No Pingbacks for this post yet...
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Evolution has become a favorite topic of the news media recently, but for some reason, they never seem to get the story straight. The staff at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture started this Blog to set the record straight and make sure you knew "the rest of the story".
A blogger from New England offers his intelligent reasoning.
We are a group of individuals, coming from diverse backgrounds and not speaking for any organization, who have found common ground around teleological concepts, including intelligent design. We think these concepts have real potential to generate insights about our reality that are being drowned out by political advocacy from both sides. We hope this blog will provide a small voice that helps rectify this situation.
Website dedicated to comparing scenes from the "Inherit the Wind" movie with factual information from actual Scopes Trial. View 37 clips from the movie and decide for yourself if this movie is more fact or fiction.
Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio
Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.
Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.
Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"
Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.
A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at
Biola University.