by Denyse O'Leary
I expect ID to grow in scope in the next decade, and to become international, but that is not mainly because of the merits of ID. I do think ID has some merits, but right now the main engine of its acceptance is the problems of Darwinism.
Darwinism, as currently believed and practiced by a great many people, is a vulgar superstition.
Darwin's useful idea in biology (which may or may not describe how most speciation occurs) has morphed into a farrago of nonsense promoted by zealots, comprising opinions on everything from cosmic black holes to religious belief. Opinions that, in their entirety, are shared by few. The more people come to know of them, the more legitimate objections to Darwinism will arise.
Thomas Huxley, Darwin's bulldog, warned that something like this might occur:
History warns us... that it is the customary fate of new truths to begin as heresies and to end as superstitions; and, as matters now stand, it is hardly rash to anticipate that, in another twenty years, the new generation, educated under the influences of the present day, will be in danger of accepting the main doctrines of the "Origin of Species," with as little reflection, and it may be with as little justification, as so many of our contemporaries, twenty years ago, rejected them.
â€“Thomas Huxley on â€“Thomas Huxley on Darwin's theory
Huxley didn't know the half of it because he probably did not anticipate the extent to which Darwinism would become part of many people's self-concept and entitlements, and therefore defended in the way any doctrine that confers status and rights is defended - ruthlessly.
But, over time, rebellions happen. Years ago, a wise clergyman stickhandling a fearful religious row told me, "Many doctrines are never doubted until someone tries too hard to defend them."
In that respect, the Darwinists' habit of persecution of ID advocates combined with their demands that school systems and museums promote Darwinism helps the IDists immeasurably. The need to stomp all over dissenters and force doctrines down skeptical throats does not spring from overflowing confidence. And nowadays, it is not hard to locate credible reasons for thinking either that Darwin was wrong or that we can't be sure he was right.
Lastly, ours is the age of information, and information theory is much more favorable to ID than 19th century materialist theory could ever be. Information theorists have little to lose in a top down universe. Thus, I am not surprised by the comfort with ID that many software engineers have expressed to me. In that, they echo a physicist:
It might even be fair to observe that the concept that information is fundamental is very old knowledge of humanity, witness for example the beginning of gospel according to John: "In the beginning was the Word."
â€“ physicist Anton Zeilinger, University of Vienna
Well, the next ten years will tell.
Go to Table of Contents
Toronto-based Canadian journalist Denyse O'Leary (www.designorchance.com) is the author of the multiple award-winning By Design or by Chance? (Augsburg Fortress 2004), an overview of the intelligent design controversy. She was named CBA Canada's Recommended Author of the Year in 2005 and is co-author, with Montreal neuroscientist Mario Beauregard, of the forthcoming The Spiritual Brain (Harper 2007).
No Pingbacks for this post yet...
|<< <||> >>|
Evolution has become a favorite topic of the news media recently, but for some reason, they never seem to get the story straight. The staff at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture started this Blog to set the record straight and make sure you knew "the rest of the story".
A blogger from New England offers his intelligent reasoning.
We are a group of individuals, coming from diverse backgrounds and not speaking for any organization, who have found common ground around teleological concepts, including intelligent design. We think these concepts have real potential to generate insights about our reality that are being drowned out by political advocacy from both sides. We hope this blog will provide a small voice that helps rectify this situation.
Website dedicated to comparing scenes from the "Inherit the Wind" movie with factual information from actual Scopes Trial. View 37 clips from the movie and decide for yourself if this movie is more fact or fiction.
Don Cicchetti blogs on: Culture, Music, Faith, Intelligent Design, Guitar, Audio
Australian biologist Stephen E. Jones maintains one of the best origins "quote" databases around. He is meticulous about accuracy and working from original sources.
Most guys going through midlife crisis buy a convertible. Austrialian Stephen E. Jones went back to college to get a biology degree and is now a proponent of ID and common ancestry.
Complete zipped downloadable pdf copy of David Stove's devastating, and yet hard-to-find, critique of neo-Darwinism entitled "Darwinian Fairytales"
Intelligent Design The Future is a multiple contributor weblog whose participants include the nation's leading design scientists and theorists: biochemist Michael Behe, mathematician William Dembski, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, philosophers of science Stephen Meyer, and Jay Richards, philosopher of biology Paul Nelson, molecular biologist Jonathan Wells, and science writer Jonathan Witt. Posts will focus primarily on the intellectual issues at stake in the debate over intelligent design, rather than its implications for education or public policy.
A Philosopher's Journey: Political and cultural reflections of John Mark N. Reynolds. Dr. Reynolds is Director of the Torrey Honors Institute at